Water jackets cleaning

One of the more difficult areas to clean in the cylinder heads and cylinder blocks of the automobile engines is the water jackets,Why?

1) The internal volumes of the water jackets are complex and very often with narrow passages. By one side the cylinder head designers wants to have a minimum water jacket volume in order that the engine can rise in temperature rapidly to have the optimum engine performance. By other side is important to refrigerate all the areas of the cylinder head , mainly around the combustion chambers , but the number of valves per cylinder create narrow passages inside the water jackets.

2) On the machining of the aluminium alloys the cutting speed are more and more elevate and create longs chips . The cycles times on the machines are more and more shorts and there is not too much time to break the chips.On the transfer lines it was easier to do than in the present CNC flexible lines.

3)As consequence of the cutting speeds and short cycle times the chips are very often pushed inside the water jackets by the final milling tools.

4) The consequence of long spring chips inside small pockets and narrow passages  is chips trapped inside the water jackets.

The cylinder head is more sensitive to this problem but some cylinder block too. Here joint you can see what you can find inside a cylinder head water jacket:

       There is a clear test : If we cut a supposed clean cylinder head in slices it will allows us to see if there are some chips trapped inside the water jacket. I’ll say that the majority of clean cylinder heads have chips inside.

Is dangerous for the engine run? Well, first you have to assembly your engine (cylinder head , cylinder block , camshafts, crankshaft..). During the automatic assemply this remaining chips can fall down of the parts and goes to the assembly machine or between the parts to be assembled blocking the operation and stopping the machine and the line.

Second if you assembly your engine with no problem but the chip remain inside , is possible than during the engine run with the vibrations and , temperature changes , the chips goes out of the water chamber and arrives to the water pump causing the failure of the water pump , heating the engine and stopping the car engine.

Another added problem is the remaining sand balls remaining inside the water jackets coming from the cast process:

 

 

 

Since many years this water jacket problem has been the major nightmare for the equipment suppliers and for the automotive industry .

The process to remove the remaining sand inside the water jackets  is called “desandind” and will be considered in a further post . today we will concentrate only in the chips removal :

Some suppliers were using a contact jet at 20/30 bars to flush inside the water jackets( ICOM, Hafroy). Or” injection flood” ( Dürr) injecting 10/15 bars jet against the waster jacket on immersion of the part . Or the “Aqua cannon”(Valiant) with a medium pressure short discharge inside the part pulsing the water inside. 

Or the High pressure ( 200 bars) target injection trough the part openings (Agullo).

Or a mixture of systems like Sugino .

In any case the problem is a difficult problem and needs test with real parts to achieve an acceptable process. Of course the automobile client is also an important part. If the cleanliness test to control the cleanliness of the cylinder head is a manual flushing of a solvent trough the part( and water jacket ) is probably than the flushing (normally at 1 to 3 bars) will not be able to remove the blocked chips inside the water jackets and the test can give a result of accepted clean part when it has trapped chips inside the water jackets.

Some cleanliness tests in the automobile have added operations to the cleanliness test procedure to verify these water jackets. One is the manual hammer percussion by the operator of the cylinder head in a certain position in order to detach the chips balls inside . I remember than years ago in an european engine manufacturer the company Hafroy supplied one transfer machine that had a pneumatic hammer in one of the Ferris wheel wash stations to reproduce the operator cleanliness test operation and try to remove this balls. I remember that the line operators call the machine the “Bell” ( a “dong” each 30 secs was not appreciated by the operators around the line).

Another system is the manual checking of the water jackets with a small  endoscope . This system is of course the more efficient but some times you can not reach all the internal areas. Only cutting the cylinder head you can really check it.

To reduce the chips and traps inside the water jackets is necessary a close work between the cylinder head designers ,cylinder head  machining engineers and the “cleaning” engineers to avoid narrow passages inside the water jackets design , to avoid big and spring chips during the machining, to have high coolant volume during the machining , or cover plates during machining . If you diminish the size of the chips , if you avoid the spring chips , if you avoid narrow passages and traps inside the water jacket , if you have more than one opening of the cylinder head water chambers you will have more opportunities to remove the inside trapped chips.

Maybe one of the Automobile manufacturers that pay more attention to the water jackets has been Fiat . In their wash process specification the request several water jacket wash operations in each of the washers of the cylinder head line. More water jacket wash operation you have with the part in different positions and injecting the water by different areas to create different flows inside the water jackets allows them to have more opportunities to remove the chips. Of course this redundant system is expensive and the present tendency in the Automotive industry is to reduce the number of washers in the lines.

In any case the miracles are impossible and if you really check inside your cylinder head water jackets(or cylinder block water jackets) you have to pay attention to the whole manufacturing process including the more effective wash processes to remove the trapped chips and to have a really clean part.

 

A good system is to collect and classify all the chips shape produced in the machining line , operation by operation .  

And then looking to the chip type remaining inside the W.J. you can identify in which machining operation the chip is produced and penetrates in the W.J. Working with the machining process engineers it comes very often the possibility to reduce the size of the chip or to eliminate the quantity remaining in the parts

 

The automobile cleanliness tests procedures are also an interesting point to be examined in a further post. They are the reason why some time one washing machines that is a good machine for an automotive manufacturer but fails in another manufacturer.

Cylinder head brush deburring(2)

The brush deburring units have a wear on the brush wire due to the abrasion with the cylinder heads deburring action.

The first brush deburring units used in the 70’s were not planetary units and the brushes were bolted to a plate .

Each plate had 15 to 20 small brushes and the time to change the brushes was too long and the live short.

 

For this reason it comes the idea to use bigger cup brushes fixed to a planetary system . The first units ( in high production lines of 180 to 300 p/h)  were installed in France in Renault and Peugeot.

Renault had their own research department and they designed a planetary system with internal grease lubrication on a close box. Agullo developed on the same dates their own planetary system but with internal lubrication with oil and compressed air overpressurizing the planetary box.

The internal oil lubricating system was more reliable than the grease system because it avoided the penetration of coolant inside the planetary box and finally was the best in the market.

Now in the market there are several companies proposing the planetary system with different concepts.

The fixation of the brush cup to the shaft of the unit has been also a device that changed with the time. At the beginning it was only a simple bolt on the center of the brush. Some time difficult to change. Then it comes a quick change with individual pressure clutches. Finally now the systems use similar devices as the CNC for their tools.

Another important point in the brush deburring is the brush wear compensation. At the beginning the Renault planetary heads used a sort of touch test to sense that the brush was in “cero” position . A step by step axis moved the planetary head table till the position that the brush was in contact with the leverage.

This leverage had a glass disc with two electrodes. The contact with the brushes gave the signal to stop the brush unit in position. This system has been used for certain  suppliers for long time , but is not reliable. The leverages and the glass disc have a lot of failures and the position is not well controlled.

The Agullo planetary units were using a wear compensation that was controlling the electric power of the unit in empty conditions( no part) and in contact ( deburring the part) . According with the desired deburring action ( soft , medium,hard) the power control had a range were the power of the unit can stay. If the power fell under a predetermined level the machine gave an alarm in order to advise the operator that the brush had to be changed. Managing the ranges and alarms it was also possible to send a pre alarm in order that the operator can prepare the new brushes and stop the machine at the end of the day.

This system with several software evolutions has been used for more than 25 years in high production units. In the last 10 years , with brush deburring machines going to CNC controls the system has also slightly changed but is still the more reliable.

Some suppliers are using the CNC to locate the brush on the “cero” position and they are moving the brush unit according with the number of parts passing trough the machine. Memorizing the positions you can calculate the length of the wire still alive in your brush, but the system is not so reliable and the brushes  become or collapsed or not full wear. The brush length is not precise as a drill tool and his dimmension is not constant.

 

 

Other suppliers ( in america)are using a pneumatic table support for the brush unit that applies a pressure to the brush at each cycle . Is more sophisticated that to use two linear springs but with the same effect : no really control of the brush wearing.

Why is so important the wear control: because a deburring cup rush can last from 5.000 to 30.000 deburred parts and the cost to change the unit has to be the minimum possible , using in the best way the length of the brush wire and keeping the mechanical deburring action force controlled to have always good deburred parts.

The USA mistake

 

Today I would want to remember the big mistake of some European and Japanese washers manufacturers in the Automotive American industry  middle 1990’s .

Sometime the successful manufacturers of one continent try to introduce their products in other continent without considering the difficulties due to the philosophy of the washer concept in each continent.

Sometime the customers of one continent wants to punish or improve their present manufacturer suppliers buying machines to a supplier from another continent without considering the difficulties due to the philosophy of the washer concept in each continent.

This happened in the 1990’s with the Japanese SUGINO . Ford Motor co placed orders for gear boxes high pressure washers to them(I hope it was in Livonia factory). The machines were of Japanese concept , giving good cleanliness quality but not appropriated to the maintenance requests from the American users ( accessibility , inside room, safety devices, documentation..). In conseque the application was a fracas and SUGINO didn’t had continuity in Ford.

In another case Ford Motor ordered a high pressure transfer wash/deburr for aluminium cylinder heads with also brush deburring.The supplier was the German company Beyss. The machine had a very complete process with brush deburring, cavitation wash, high pressure wash , ferris wheel.

When the machine starts to work in the factory( Romeo?) all the American normal washers suppliers were invited to see and appreciate the top of the technology in washing machines.  Not more than two years later the machine was a nightmare for the client due to his high complexity and the quantity of chips remaining inside the machine .The maintenance was difficult for the customers people,they were not trained for the job( complexity,controls, safety standards..).In consequence the application was a fracas and Beyss didn’t had continuity in Ford. Beyss lost a lot of money .

The American Automobile market had some particularities not present in Japan or in Europe:

 1) The car engines were much bigger . V engines of 3 to 6 litters volume. These sizes in Europe would be considered truck engines , not car engines.

2) The throughput in America was 200 to 300 parts /hour . In Japan or Europe the throughput was between 100 and 125 p/h

3) The tendency in Europe was to install sophisticate automatic filters for the wash liquid filtration with small tanks to have a minimal quantity of  liquid  in  the machine, when in America the tendency was opposite : big tanks simple filters and safety manual bags filters.

4) The amount of chips arriving to the machine with the parts was much bigger ( three to four times) than in Europe.

5) The detergents used in America were restricted to the environmental request of the State and in was not easy to use new ones used in Europe.In America the customers were working at ambient temperature ( witout machine heating)

6) The maintenance request in America were different. The “sizes” of an American foreman were much bigger than the Japanese foreman or European foreman. The machine access had to be bigger and easier in America .

7) The preventive maintenance philosophy in America was different: better to change a mechanical part after a certain number of working hours , than to check frequently how is it ,and evaluate if it has to be changed. It was more a “big maintenance” when needed than an small “periodic maintenance” to prevent a “big maintenance”.

8)The mechanical robustness of the machines in America was bigger than in Europe or Japan ans less sophisticate . For this reason the high production machines were hydraulic driven instead of electromechanical. The American hydraulics  standards were very constrained for the Europeans or Japanese  with inexperience and a high cost for them.

Al theses particularities were not well evaluated by Sugino, Beys… and caused their failure but it was also the pressure of the customers that forced them to deliver without enough analyses of the Market needs.

This was the situation when the company AGULLO arrives to the American market. People in Ford USA saw the Agullo Ferris wheel washing transfer machines in Ford Europe and wants to try it in America.

Then the american premium washer suppliers were Ingersoll (Centri-Spray), and Valiant on the Ferris wheel machines and Rocktool,and Liquiburr( in bankrupt) on high pressure.

Knowing the American particularities , AGULLO arrived to this market with the Ferris wheel machines( in line transfer with two vertical rotary tables across) for the cylinder blocks and cylinder heads.

The machines were in stainless steel body, with big tanks , robust mechanics, total accessibility (full side wall as motorized vertical guillotine door) for the maintenance, high pressure wash, and machine tool mechanics quality. In Chrysler with individual automatic filters , in Ford with Central filtration systems.

These machines astonish the customers and competitors. Some American suppliers commented the machines to be like the  ”Cadillac “of the Washers.

 

 

The majority of the machines are still working and have been retooled for new engines. This is an example to show that the washing machines are specific machines linked to a market and demands of a market and that before to go to other markets ,other customers, other requests,other mentalities, all the details have to be analysed in dip  .

The training of the customer is also important because if the machines are of a new technology for him , the operation and the maintenance is new and without a hard support from the supplier it could defeat.

Years later another example of that happen when one Automotive customer wants to buy exactly the same machines that he saw in Germany working in cylinder heads and cylinder blocks featuring new technologies for the Americans : hot cavitation wash, oil evaporators and vacuum dry. The machines were running successfully in Europe but not in America. Two years after the installation , the customer was enable to run the machines . ( tanks too small , foaming , parts too hot for the leak test , difficult maintenance , not enough training for the maintenance people in the factory, documentation not adequate…). The  consequence : the supplier was banned for several years in the customer Factories.

The washing machines are special machines receiving the hardest working conditions in the automotive factory : aggressive detergents , agresive machining oils and coolants , chips , helical chips , flat chips , burrs , liquid temperature , full humid ambient , temperatures changes , air condensations , noise , PLC or CNC  machine tools standards , rust atmosphere… and nobody likes to maintain it ( it is a dirty job…).The machine needs a good maintenance people understanding of chemicals , electronics, mechanics , lubrication , and also “process”(wash-blow off).

To be successfully on the utilisation of a washing machine from one Continent in the other is necesary the full implication of the washer manufacturer with the customer factory engineers , and factory maintenance people (not only the customer’s purchase or staff )before the construction of the machine. Is the only way to be successfully and that the machines and the washer manufacturer can last time in the customer preferences.

Maybe the future would be that the washer manufacturer has also the responsability for the maintenance and warranty the machine performances? .I know that the are some customers looking for that.

The machine engineering of the AGULLO washers in America inspired to several american manufacturers who updated their design and technologies and incorporate to their machines some AGULLO particularities like the  robustness, mechanics or the full size guillotine door( See Valiant , HMM pictures)

Gantry wash robots vs. articulated wash Robots

The utilisation of robots in the washing machines began for the need to wash different parts in the same machine or the need to high pressure deburr of some areas of the parts .

The german Dürr Ecoclean starts to use the robots in their in-line transfer DGI machines as a complementary high pressure wash of  cylinder blocks or cylinder heads. The parts were transferred in a lift and carry transfer trough the machine an in one station it was the robot with the high pressure jet in the wrist that  works on the part. The robot was located vertical with base at the floor outside the machine with a complete glove on the arm to protect the robot arm inside the machine.

The same philosophy was applied by Stic-Hafroy (now Dürr Ecoclean) ,  ICOM , Valiant , ITF and others. But it happen also the application of deburring small parts like ABS distributors or injectors components where the robot ( or robots) were picking the parts from a pallet and presenting the parts in front of HP jets or lances . In this case the wrist of the robot had grippers for the part and no jets as before.

The”flexibility” of the machine in this case is coming from the possibility to have several wash/deburr programs inside the same machine , but the gripper of the robot need to have at least common points in the component to be washed in order to pick the parts.

Here is appearing the two different concepts on the robotic wash/deburr applications : a robotic wash/deburr operation with a jet moved by the robot against a part transferred by a mechanical system or a robot with a gripper picking the part and moving the part against HP wash/deburr fixed location jets.

In the first case( robot moving the jet) the robot is less exposed to the direct splash of water and there is no mechanical-pneumatic-electric components on the wrist.

 

In the second case (the robot moving the part) the robot wrist is exposed to receive direct high pressure splash , and it has mechanical-pneumatic-electric components on the part gripper risking to be wet .

Some people with experience in robot automation have plunge in the wash/deburr applications with robots gripping the parts without evaluating the additional risk on the wrist. The robot suppliers are working hard to protect the articulated robot but the maximum protection proposed is a IP65 for the arm , with stainless steel covers , and IP68 for the wrist( see my before “post” concerning the IP validity’s). Some of them they are also adding  air over pressure for the wrist. In any case in these applications there is much more risk than in the case of the robot moving the jet.

 In the before post I mentioned the advantages of the Agullo gantry moving the jet at the end of the vertical arm with all the mechanical outside the machine.

 

 

 

The same disposition is adapted by the japanese SUGINO . Sugino is living in the country with more robot suppliers of the world . Why Sugino is not using the articulated robot in their machines? : Because they are more confident with the gantry on the top of the machine than with a robot.

 

 

 

Other manufacturers like the german Arau has presented in the Parts2clean Stuttgart exhibition his robot cell using also a gantry in the roof of the machine. (years before it was using articulated robots inside the machine).Another example is the german Piller that is using the gantry on top of the machine for the HP deburr jet in his cells.

Another advantage of the gantry robot utilisation is that the machine has only one electric control: a CNC known by the users and easy to run. In the case of the articulated robots inside machines , the machine needs a PLC and the robot has his own electronic control( two controls units in one machine).

But the articulated robot has also good points :It can load/unload the part in the machine by himself  when the gantry robot moving the jet , needs of  another transfer device for the parts, it can be produced in advance and customised in the last moment (gripper and programme) ..

So , what a dilemma ¡¡… Yes , and there is another interesting point : the total investment for the machine.

The Robot cells with articulated robots carrying the part are as single  cell an “economic” machine compared with a transfer-robotic  in line machine , or a rotary transfer-robotic machine. But the throughput is not the same.

In a robotic cell loading and unloading the part with the articulated robot you have dead time( load/unload) that penalize the complete cycle of the machine . More big is the part to be washed ( heavier) more time you will spend on the load/unload( lower speed on the movements due to the inertia). The wash time and the blow-off /dry times can not be fully reduced and then there is a need to use several robotic cells according with the requested throughput production .That’s means that you will need two,four.. or five robotic cells versus one equivalent transfer in line or rotary transfer robotic machines.

As a general rule we can say that in the majority of the automotive cylinder blocks and cylinder heads applications the investment is higher with the robotic cells . But is also an strategic choice: you can have one robotic cell as spare , in case of a shutdown in another, or you can increase the production step by step buying the cells in several years … Interesting comparison.

Robot cells : wash / deburr

In the STUTTGART Parts2clean exhibition , a lot of WASHER manufacturers were claiming their ability to supply robot applications for the wash and deburr process.

The application of robots in the wash/deburr is not new. Late in the 1980’s AGULLO was one of the first companies in the world to look for the application of these technologies. In this time the robots were mainly hydraulics or pneumatics and the main robot suppliers were the Americans UNIMATION ( Polar-articulated) and PRABB( cartesian) .

 To look closely to this applications I remember that I visited these two companies in USA , and both were proclives to decline any warranty of the robot working in the wet and dirt conditions of a washing machine.

Why? : The conditions inside a wash chamber are very inconvenient for the robot : water splash, possible direct contact with high pressure jet( 150 to 800 bars), hot ambient ( 50 to 70ºC), high humidity air , vapours , condensations ,  solids dirt , mechanical chock due to the chips removed from the part that can crash against the robot arms as bullets…

For the part gripper at the end of the robot wrist the same problems that for the robot : water , humidity, condensations, temperature, mechanical bullets… and additionally : problems for the electric switches and wiring , and pneumatic hoses ,controlling the open/close positions of the gripper. 

So de-couraging was the result of these visit to USA that in the AGULLO company it was decided to design a specific robot to respond to the difficult conditions of the wash/deburr operations. The Market was requesting machines able to wash different parts, in the same machine, and at low production and the robot could help for that. The classic washing machines had then wash box fixtures with pin point jets adapted to each part to be washed . If the parts to be washed were different , then it was necessary to change the wash boxes of the machine at each time that the new part arrived to the machine.

For certain machines like crankshaft washers , or cylinder head washers , it was possible to create one fixture that was carrying he wash boxes and then the operator could change the complete package for each new part. With the cylinder block washers the wash fixture becomes heavy and requested a lot of time and hand labour to be changed. A robot (despite his high price) could simplify the work with only a wash robot program to be stetted for each part.  

The result in 1983 was the design of a Cartesian robot , five axis ,with all their mechanics and servos on the opposite end of the arms( patented) .The payload was 350Kg and a prototype for validation was build in the Barcelona Agullo factory. Some of the customers robot experienced people visited the robot and gave some feedback. The most important  was coming from a Mercedes robot engineer suggesting to switch from the hydraulic servos( American Moog) of the prototype to the electric drive system as it was the future for the robots at least in Europe. The robotic electronic command was also another concern . Too much electronic companies offered robotic commands in the shows but they didn’t have experience in the field. By other side the customers didn’t like to train their people to each robotic command of the suppliers .

Another concern was also to consider if instead to grip the part to be washed to the robot arm , if it would be faster and agile to move the jet with the gantry robot and leave the part static. Then instead to need a 300Kg payload to move a cylinder block to wash and his gripper , we would need only a 50 or 70 Kg payload for the high pressure applications. Finally the decision was to re-convert the design to a Cartesian gantry robot with electric drive and servos with CNC controls ( Siemens or Allan Bradley the more popular then in the field ) and to move the jet. Totally a four axis gantry robot CNC controlled , working against the part to be washed presented in a fixture , or an in line transfer or a rotary table transfer. The fixture could have a supplementary CNC axis giving a total of five axis , enough for the wash/deburr process.

With this gantry robot located in the roof of the machine , with folded bellows to close the gap on the roof , all the mechanical an electrics of the gantry were outside the machine well protected against any water splash , or condensations. No mechanics neither electrics were on the wet area of the machine but all was outside the machine in the roof for easy access.The CNC command was controlling the gantry robot and the machine itself.

This AGULLO gantry robot was build for more than 17 years , around 100 units , and a derivative of it is still supplied by Dürr Ecoclean on some Rotary transfer washers for cylinder blocks and cylinder heads applications. There is one of these gantry robot 14 years old that is still working in his washer.

Why I have explained all these past experiences?  Because the alternative to the gantry robot using the articulated robots in the machines was difficult years ago. The first that I know were used the Smart-COMAU(Fiat) for the Borg Warner USA compressor applications but with the articulated robot outside the machine , vertical, on the floor, and with a complete vertical circular bellow wall to protect the robot. This bellow last normally no more than one year in normal conditions but with accidents or bad manual movements it has to be replaced very often. The english manufacturer CERA was also trying to use the same robot layout but with ABB robot.

In France Renault developed also one small vertical Cartesian robot that was used by the french company Brochot on the machines supplied to Renault to clean / deburr gear boxes but with many problems on the belows and mechanics, because the complete robot was inside the machine.

Fanuc was also marketing his small articulated robots for small wash applications ( first in japan and later in USA), but with frequent disassembling for maintenance.

Then ABB pushed also his robots . They were applied in the high pressure jet cutting located in the roof of the water-jet cabinets , and this application inspired to certain washer manufacturers to use the articulated robots inside the washing machines. 

 

Manufacturers like STIC_Hafroy in France and ICOM in Italy , Eurowide in England used the ABB in the roof with a big textile wrap ( moving the water jet).

Today the articulated robot suppliers have improved their robots and now they start to propose a better water protection to the end wrist and to the robot body . (As is the case of ABB and in a second place Fanuc,may be we could also add Staubli if his last robot runs well). In consequence there are more and more manufacturers that they propose “robotic washers” using standard robots of the market.

A lot of robot  suppliers assure IP67 protection for the robot ,but maybe we have to remember that IP67 protection in the robot is not enough for a wash deburr application . You would have to go to the “electrics standards” and see what means “IP67″ . The first digit”6″ means solids protection :”power dirt protection” .The second digit (“7″) is a water protection but “7″ means protection to the water inmersion without pressure for 30 minutes¡¡ Inside a wash/deburr cell , there is high pressure water ¡¡

Some robot suppliers claim higher protection :”IP68″ , but again please note that the digit ”8″ means “harder conditions (to be defined by the supplier) of immersion than the IP67″ but still immersion , not protection to the high pressure jets.

What means all that ?, that the washer manufacturer who is proposing to a client a “robot cell” with an articulated robot of the market needs to add some additional engineering to his machine for additional protection of the robot . If not, the client is taking a big risk ordering a machine to this washer  manufacturer. 

But there is still a confusion using the term “robotic washer”. What is better to move the jet with the robot or the part against the wash/deburr jet?. We will see in a next post…

Parts2clean Stuttgart .High Pressure wash/deburr

I remember when AGULLO supplied the first high production (220p/h) washing machine with high pressure water for wash/debur of cylinder heads in the Automotive industry in Europe . It was early in the 1980’s and the High pressure pumps power were for 600Kw. In this time not many companies in the world were able to supply high production machines and the addition of the high pressure was not frequent.

The high pressure installation engineering was a challenge. Not only the high pressure pump supplier didn’t have experience in the 5.500 hour/year continuous running of the pumps but other circumstances were added : working with recirculated water (filtration engineering) , keeping the water at controlled temperature (cooling engineering), keeping the overall noise of the installation (then at 85 dB )(noise insulation engineering), HP safety valves and HP distribution valves reliability , materials used on the HP jets and lances (mechanical engineering) , materials resistance to the HP impact for the fixtures and clamps, vapour exhaust ,vibrations transmission all along the machine,chemical detergents compatibility,flexible hose life…a lot of engineering and innovation.

For many years the AGULLO experience in the high pressure was on the top . Now , 25 years later there is a lot of companies that they say can offer high pressure wash installations.The HP pumps and accessories suppliers have more experience and the technology is better known but , is really so easy , are they selling with knowledgement of high pressure technique’s?… I don’t thing so.

Who are now the companies in the edge?

In the Parts2clean exhibition in Stuttgart I visited SUGINO , as I wrote in my before post who has a lot of experience in Japan on this Installations mainly in low production.

 In Europe we can find one small specialist: Piller in Baden-Wurttenberg(Germany) who has several HP deburr machines types with manual load or robot load ,like the CNC “Vector Jet”cabinets and dominates the deburring range of 400 to 800 bars with water or oil. Their experience comes mainly from the small mechanical components deburr at low production.They had difficulties to supply the complete process of wash,deburr.blow off , dry in one installation but step by step they are finding sollutions to do it using several machines. In Germany is considered as the main experienced supplier. Their clients are mainly germans. As particularity I can highlight that Piller  uses a CNC gantry robot on the roof of the machine moving the HP jet , keeping the part clamped on the table that can have additional CNC axis.

 

 

Another company present in the exhibition is also the german INDA-Markert of the SCHMID group. Indawas an small company with local activity in the high pressure that met Markert with experience in the German automotive market (Mercedes)and transfer washing machines. Both together are now presenting also CNC cabinets for HP operations with HP automatic tool exchange , or rotary transfers, or in line transfers. Out of Germany there are not too active ( out of Hyunday or Kia projects). They were also presenting a robot for deburring gearboxes , with automatic HP tools changer( rotary lances , V-jet , pin point jet..).

 

Of course we can not forget Dürr Ecoclean as global high pressure supplier despite his presence in the Parts2clean exhibition with only one machine for the general market ,the Cmax that I will talk about in a another post. They have the experience and globality that some others don’t have.

Another big specialist that becomes more global is the Canadian Valiant . This company was for years the competitor of AGULLO , and Centry Spray(after Ingersoll) ,and now for Dürr Ecoclean in America.

Valiant is present at the exhibition trough the Austrian TMS company ( body handling) hat now is part of the Valiant group and that will take the responsibility of the Valiant washers/deburr for Europe. The last 5 years of Valiant in USA have been successful , passing for the transfer in line , Ferris wheel supplier to be a complete partnerfor the Automotive industry ,supplying turn key installations with the handling, robot integration,washers(high pressure or robotics),deburr , leak test ,and special assembling machines and AGV transport . Their Aachen Engineering adventure is now forgotten and they seems determined to attack the European market from their new base in Austria. Is the only manufacturer that can compete with Dür Ecoclean as “global” supplier.

 

Part2clean Stutgart (4) Rotary transfer washers

Out of the already commented rotary transfer machines for small components , in the Parts2clean show I noted other manufacturers that they are active to wash or deburr bigger parts ( main powertrain components as cylinder block, cylinder head, crankshafts, gear box…).

Almost all the manufactures of these machines were German , and only few “foreign”. One of this foreign manufacturers was the Italian Tecnofirma. This company is an “old” company in the business. At the beginning mainly present in Italy . Years ago it started to wash cylinder block and cylinder heads Automobile components but the presence of AGULLO and ICOM in Italy stopped their development in the 1990’s . They were limited to crankshafts transfers or gear box components so long as AGULLO and ICOM had orders for the cylinder block and cylinder heads in line transfer washers for FIAT.

Tecnofirma developed rotary transfer washers for other components related to the motorcycles , tractors or gearbox components in Italy and also for the customer subsidiaries in Latinamerica or East Europe.. Now is improving his sales action in Germany and France , and they presented an interesting rotary transfer wash/deburr machine ( four stations) with an small ABB robot carrying a jet for the flex wash or blow-off.

 

 

 

 

The robot is applied directly inside of the wash chamber and has a jet on his wrist.

The High pressure pack and filter is installed in a separate module with the classic Hamelmann piston pump. The filtration is trough a safety cartridge filters and automatic paper filter

The machine has a robust look and the price announced seems interesting. Tecnofirma has a good experience in mechanical components customers. I hope that they can have a development in the next years if they achieve their export development.

Another of the “foreign” exhibitors was the Japanese SUGINO .This company has also a long history on the wash-deburr business. Their main market is the Japan companies and their transplants to other countries.

SUGINO has the best experience in high pressure applications in the wash and the deburr. Don’t forget that the Japanese automobile companies were the first ,worldwide ,to improve their cleanliness levels using high pressure water in their washers and after using also the high pressure for the deburring.This Market was advanced against the European or American markets.

SUGINOis the sole wash producer in the world, that I know ,that is also producing their high pressure pumps. In fact the division of high pressure pumps and his applications in all the industries is one of the hard points of Sugino. They have several patents and the advantage to produce themselves also the high pressure accessories ( 2ways valves, safety valves, HP jets, lances, distributors…).The use of the high pressure goes till to the jet cutting at 4.000 bars

Surprisingly despite their high experience and acknowledgement in the high pressure they have been not active in Europe. Their competitor KITO at least supplied Toyota in UK but Sugino has been out of this market. In USA they sold some machines 15 years ago in the gear box Ford factories but they din’t push too much the market and remain anecdotal.

Is really a pity because for me Sugino has experience , acknowledgement and inventive. Some tricky devices and original process invented by them ,and not yet discovered by the German suppliers( neither Americans), are fantastic and very efficient.

In the Parts2clean exhibition they presented the “Jet Clean Center”. Is a cell with CNC axis that allows to high pressure wash and high pressure deburr small components . These components can be manually load or robot load.

The must interesting thing of this machine is the Turret tool jet head. The turret has 6 possible different high pressure jets or lances that can be feeded individually trough a HP distributor. This machine is valid for small productions in a cell configuration and has been the first machine on this business to adapt the form of a High pressure cell , idea reproduced now for a lot of manufacturers.

 

SUGINO has also a family of rotary transfer machines for cylinder blocks and cylinder heads . The machine with two , three or four stations is integrated on in line or in cells productions . Recently they have supplied these machines for the new Mazda-Ford factory in China. They have a combination of the machine with a Cartesian 4 axis wash gantry robot located in the roof totally outside the machine as Durr Ecoclean Barcelona had.

The originality of their machine is that the load/unload of the parts can be made automatically without any further device .A vertical movement of the complete rotary table allows the part to be load/unload on a conveyor at the same time that the same vertical movement of the table allows to better wash and blow-off the parts in the other stations.

The application of the gantry robots instead of anthropomorphous robot in the high pressure wash-deburr applications is an interesting debate that I will write about in one further post after also a further robot cells post.

The weak point of these machines is that the indexing driving device with the vertical movement of the table is inside the machine , not easily accessible for maintenance. To do the same process the design of the Dürr Ecoclean Barcelona transfer rotary machine was much better solved with full accessibility to all the mechanics either rotary , lifting or gantry ( but more expensive of course).

In general the SUGINO wash-deburr processes , and high pressure devices are original,tricky and effective. The mechanical concept of the machine and their sizes are really designed for the Japanese Market . The design should be hardly modified to support the European rules and standards and by this reason is very difficult that some European client accept their machines standards. Is not their fault is a question of market demands. Something similar happened on the first machines supplied to Ford America.

But for markets like the Japanese or China, Korea..where the demand for big access for maintainability , and safety rules are not so stringent than in Europe , these machines are valid. But as the price is also important and these solutions are chipper, the client has to balance his decisions.

SUGINO has now a subsidiary in Chekia for his division of machine tools. It would be maybe a good opportunity for them to redesign their machines for the European Market demands.

OK ,that’s all for today. See you soon in my next post.

Parts2clean Stuttgart (3) Rotary transfer washers

One of my former customers , ask me why I have not talk about his Dürr Ecoclean rotary transfer washing machines in my last post.

Sorry¡¡¡ ,  effectively I supplied when I was in Dür Ecoclean an installation with three excellent rotary transfer washers to clean common rail injection pumps components at 2.000/300 bars that are today working 24h a day without problems.

The installation had a previous stage of high pressure deburr with robot at 2.000 bars followed of a rotary transfer machine with medium pressure spray wash,high pressure wash(300bar) with injection in contact and push pull system, spray , blow-off , vacuum dry . These machines are the top range in the field with central filtration and high pressures power units.The machines were designed and engineered by the Barcelona Dürr Ecoclean office team that was closed in 2007 but I’m not sure that these type of machines are still part of the Dürr Ecoclean catalogue. For this reason a I didn’t mention it in my last post that was dedicated mainly to the Parts2clean presentations.

Another innovative advantage of these machines was the flexibility as easy reconversion for new different parts. The pallet support on the rotary transfer table was of a quick change design. The clamping and High Pressure injection devices were of quick reconversion. The high pressure robot deburr( 2.000 bar operation) had automatic gripper change device with automatic grippers storage .

As maintenance features they had: total index driving system accessibility, total open doors for inside accessibility , quick change of internal components. The Centralised tank , filtration ,medium pressure pumps ,high pressure pumps ,very high pressure pumps , water treatment, and safety filters were installed in a remote area allowing to deserve three or more rotary transfer machines. This layout allowed to have a minimum surface layout on the working areas occupied by the machines itself , keeping the bigger floor surface of the tanks and pumps in the remote area . By other side this layout was an advantage for the maintenance people having all the pumps, valves,and filters in the same area for easy control and follow up..   

Neverless there is another type of Rotary transfer machines , the machines for powertrain components like cylinder blocks and cylinder heads by one side , and another simpler machines for gearboxes and crankshaft .

In my next post we will talk of the cylinder block and cylinder head rotary transfer machines.